Fair
If he does that then literally nobody in the right mind will be able to make any argument about his intentions at all since we’d be reaching into the realm of rewriting the lore just to spite people.
Crystal clear spite and hatred for his own community.
As one of vetex’s pay piggy I can’t see how it isn’t spiteful in nature.
People will fight tooth and nail to try and convince me that his actions are 100% reasonable and not at all spite driven even though it could hardly be more obvious that they absolutely are.
See: Hanmbi
Like I don’t think he hates the community or what not I can’t see how he would want to work a game for a community he hates but he clearly gets pissed off by them and will act/do things out of spite towards that. He didn’t want magic change, everyone did and it pissed him off, and in turn he makes it stupidly hard and bs. Like I don’t think he’s a bad person for that but calling it out is valid
A crazy notion lol you don’t gotta agree with every action someone does but still want to support them/their projects
He said that he killed 172 poison jaws without a single ptd
Of course not, because the next poison jaw kill’s drop rate isn’t an automatic success just because the previous 172 kills is a fail
Alright so firstly he said 72.
Secondly your point was that he specifically didn’t kill them ‘in a row’ and that that was why he didn’t get a drop. Gambler’s fallacy.
If that’s not what you were saying here, then what were you saying here?
We’ve had it wrong all along, magic reset 2000 robux is good because fuck mage
Now you’re just twisting my words while I’m trying to explain something.
I’m not talking to you anymore. At least, not in this topic.
You said something that made no sense, claimed that’s how math works, and now completely refuse to explain your thought process.
You’re being disingenuous at best.
Okay, you can talk to me then.
Then how does it work?
It’s touching to see this image circulating out in the wild ![]()
Goodbye ![]()
it would be criminal if they didnt give us a magic reset
Like I said, gamblers fallacy
He killed 72+ poison jaws in a row without getting a ptd, but then he assumes that the next kill would be a ‘guarantee’ to ‘make up’ for all these fails
That, is wrong
That, is gamblers fallacy
Quote him where he says that or anything similar, I do not recall seeing that.
@Walyn
If he killed 71 poison jaws, the 72nd kill would still have a 1 in 7 chance of dropping a ptd, regardless of whether the previous 71 attempts were a fail or a success

