Flem explains: Asexuality and Aromantics and how ones words may have consequences

It counts as sexual orientation due to being related to such (no sexual attraction which is indeed an orientation- similiar to how gay people may be attracted to only dudes or bi people may be attracted to both).

Aromanticismn meanwhile is a romantic orientation and is thereby different!

One can have different romantical and sexual attractions, really- depends from person to person.

In general it is really not as talked about as it should be- often because the victims tend to not speak out about such and aces and aros tend to be a ā€œminorityā€ in the community of sorts- i also simply like to explain matters in a way that others may understand and may hold more ā€œFlem explainsā€ topics if i ever feel like such, i simply like to inform and educate :3

in the first sentence they don’t mean that people misunderstand asexuality as being a sexual orientation, they mean that people misunderstand what it means as a sexual orientation or perhaps don’t understand that it really is one, or so i think

3 Likes

So was that ā€œnot a sexual orientationā€ part mainly targeted towards people’s views on aromantics rather than asexuals? That was the only part that confused me since I see asexuality as a sexual orientation and then you say it isn’t and then you say it is

It is not ment as ā€œit isnt a sexual orientationā€ but ment as "misunderstood as orientation- apologies if such was unclear, english is not my main language

You dropped this, matey :crown:

Now honestly I’m damn impressed this thread hasn’t gotten nuked already.

Im honestly quite impressed as well, i expected a few of the usual shenanigans usually found on the forums

Well you are my new lord and savior (I’m making a religion around you, suffer as a prophet)

Did some carbon-based lifeform just said… no vegetal homophobia?

image

@anon82332293 @Colonsque

Please do read the ā€œi will flag what is not appropiate/strays off topicā€ in the original post- i desire to keep this civil.

First, ok and? Second, I am gon become Immanuel Kant with the ā€žhow do you understand inapropriate?ā€ classic.

Basically, things that happen to not apply to the forum rules (i.e. straying off topic with memes) or starting stuff- pinging two people well known for starting arguments seems a bit… problematic.
Unless they can handle themselves, of course, but we shall see.

1 Like

We’re literally in the off topic category.

Aight someones gonna get their 100 k galleons today

the category is just for creating topics unrelated to arcane odyssey, each topic has its own theme that is expected to be adhered to within the replies

Ok let go bac to topicc. So uh, in my personal opinion asexuals are just kinda random, I aint got a phobia for yall. And how unexpected, a community meant to spread love, as Loki once said, is ā€žassaultingā€ their own allies just because instead of liking everyone, they like no one.

ā€žMój ojciec wiedział dobrze i ja także wiem
że któregoś dnia na dalekich krańcach
Wybuchnie lokalny pożar
I runie imperiumā€
~Zbigniew Herbert, Przemiany Liwiusza

Ok now we just gotta get optie summoned and we’re ready

…i do seriously hope both optie and the other lad decide against starting stuff, especially seeing as heavier topics (like mentioned in the CWs and TWs) were discussed and that is not really a good place to start arguments.

it’s bad practice to take a few and label them the entirety, the majority of the lgbtq community is actually supportive of asexuals

are you saying the lgbtq community is going to fall apart because of this