The american scientists will disagree with you. The ESA (Endangered Species Act) will protect dragons if you can’t find enough of them to consider them not “Threatened”.
Now if it was like golden and the dragon lived in the rocky mountains nearby. it’s not 1000 people you’d be killing/injuring for life.
Who ever said the dragon was being aggressive. At some point they’d realize humans are insane psychotic apes and probably leave them alone.
At least that’s why the Spectator is holding himself up on an island far from human civilization.
Gtg
bye?
we don’t even need nukes we are forgetting that other bombs exist, along with mustard gas and that’s just if guns don’t work which they most likely will,
Thus, Humans are better than dragons
now if you dial back humans technology to the year 500.
For dragons to win we would have to be nerfed, thus dragons will not win against humans
Humans strongest form can’t fight a protected animal.
Ok, you’re literally admitting that we beat them
eh sure. Humans don’t like being weak and they fear the unknown.
Invisible stalker from dnd
Now that is brutal. So if you used DnD dragons against the real world who would win?
Imagine a red dragon great wyrm pulling up to denver or tokyo.
dragons > humans normally
humans with technology > dragons normally
disgustingly OP dragons >>>>>>> humans with technology
Artillary cannons. The humans would win quickly after a tad bit of time for us to moblise
What happens if Tiamat shows up? or Baumaut I guess.
well thats just unfair considering Timiat, you know… BLEW UP THE WORLD ONCE
Rayquaza solos Earth
it canonically likes humans so it wouldn’t do that though
True. She is a god.
Anyways in my prefered reality dragons and humans live side by side in (harmony?) more mutual benefits. Dragons help transport goods, dragons get paid in cows.
dragons can just take the cows lol
Then the humans would attack them. Either way they don’t have to fight psychotic apes for food this way.