now that is an answer i like
Why my iq is 14 h gun innings ghgg he do nvgjf the jhgjhbjj
my iq 189 
didn’t you have 115+ yesterday?
I changed it based on a 1 minute online test that is completely inaccurate but I want to stroke my ego. i.e. Look at everyone else
Welp if we’re going off cap my IQ is over 9000
but yeah iq doesn’t matter after all, i just treat it with shits and laughs
as the now late Stephen Hawking says:
Fun fact, Stephen Hawking’s iq was 160 and the 10th highest iq in history so anyone who put 160 and isn’t trolling is on the top ten highest iqs in history ig.
I’m pretty sure that’s not true
That is true
Where did you get that he has the 10th highest iq in history?
half of everyone is below average
The first 3 links in google when I search top 10 iqs in history albeit the 4th says it’s Thomas Young who’s iq was estimated and not recorded (It’s also 1 from 2014).
These articles don’t seem very credible or scientific. Their lists differ vastly in spite of the strange fact they all put hawking in 10th place. This is literally how the second article is doing it and the other two didn’t mention their methodologies at all (not counting the people they included that actually took iq tests)
The article you’re showing is the 4th article I mentioned and if you know how google’s algorithm works then you’d know it shows articles at different locations based on a multitude of things but could you not have the common sense to scroll down to check what article you’re reading.
(This is the article you took that from)
I highly doubt you even read the actual articles considering you consider yourself in the 98th percentile without being able to scroll down on the evidence you’re trying to provide.
It is also the 4th article on my side which I had clearly mentioned.
The articles I used only had people that had actually taken iq tests other than Einstein so unless you want to refute Einstein’s iq being between 160-190 (They gave a generous margin) then I don’t see the problem.
Yes…exactly
Where is the 2- button
In any case there’s no way for me to access your sources but I am still very doubtful that there is an official list of highest iqs in history. IQ tests are known to become less reliable very far from 100. Also there’s this
So you argue about sources therefore you bring up an un-sourced Wikipedia that’s “source” doesn’t even provide a percentage, i’ve tried multiple combinations of the actual Stanford Binet intelligence scale
Although some pages in this are omitted, if it was a truly important fact and not an assumption based on Normal Distribution it likely wouldn’t have been hidden, even ignoring this assuming it’s on a hidden page it’s a model from 1937.