Not unless you have some weird ass genetics we’re just making stuff up in that case but be my guest and pretend because I know this topic is gonna derail
dude it’s basic biology you either have one or the other unless you’ve done some weird ass sorcery or have some stellaris ass genetics
Okay if you give me your location I’ll come over with a scalpel or scissors or a cement mixer and show you how easily you can end up without a gender (this is a joke for legal reasons.)
Even if one were to remove those areas (outlast reference) you’d still have chemicals such as testosterone and other identifiers to show you’re a male which is scientifically proven
Nah I don’t want to argue I just want to discuss because nothing ends well for both parties if there’s an argument
yes such as testosterone that would be natural in a male so that’s a way you can prove it if they somehow managed to lose their most precious artifact plus just other things such as facial features or genetics
There was literally a female boxer who was just born with a high production of testosterone and was literally never male, yet so many people ignored the very facts they hold over actual transgenders just because she looked masculine
Proving all the more that “sex” is often a bullshit divide and measurements of hormone production would be far better instead
I mean if that’s what you think I respectfully disagree but that’s your opinion of course and in my own I’d say while that example is a good one 99% of the time you’re gonna be able to tell via testosterone or chemicals or other identifiers, genetics more in particular but hey you can think what you want to I guess
Yeah, but that’s one out of a thousand. Most of the time girls produce more estrogen and vice versa. As you say, „sex is a useless divide” yet despite her turbo testosterone she’s still a woman with the ability to birth. Femboys could be fathers, even with high estrogen, thus your argument is invalid. Also that division has worked for like 250 thousand years of homo sapien existence so why bother trying to redefine it?
All elements that aren’t hydrogen, helium or oxygen are a minority smaller than 2%. For example, only 28 grams of astatine are estimated to exist on Earth. A periodic table with any more periods than 3 is just conforming to the minority.
Or do you agree that, even though the remaining elements are nearly nonexistant in the universe, the fact that we have discovered them means we must nevertheless acknowledge them as elements that could possibly exist and as such need to be recognized?
You do know I can see you edited your post buddy, right ?..
It’s not much less outrageous and I stand by what I said, but it’s quite gutsy to try and ridicule me while actively backing out of the point you made
Oh hey, I see that my topic got a surprising amount of replies! How lovely! I love when people engage thoughtfully and with good humor on what I post! I wonder what they’re all ab- and of course it’s an argument on what “gender” is…
@Mutni_0 This is literally a joke topic, just like the original. Can you just… let people enjoy the funny? Like, I’m sure there’s some places which would enjoy the mental exercise of arguing with you, but I don’t think this is one of those places.