its
2 and a half here and im going to sleep
can we do this-
ah nvm sure, its WalonGamer
Aye, are you in a server right now?
joining
im in, sever is pretty empty
its okay i understand 
got it, pleasure doing business with you
Reward has been collected.
actually 5, there’s that one by matus in cirrus island’s secret talking about the island clouds
erm actuakkly its more
okay no maybe youre right, we couldnt pick Zaix’s up either right?
@anon904914 should i give the money back?
oh wait no you can pick that up
yeah then only morden neviro rackham and zaix woul count
Obtainable journals, you pretty much gave the answer already which are Morden, Rackham, Zaix and Neviro
the question only asked which journals could be read though, not which could be obtained
That’s why I gave the context:
I wouldn’t add it if that wasn’t my intention 
that’s the introductory statement, not the question
The thing is it’s a context clue, it’s there to trick someone answering it. I encountered a similar question in the english tests in my high school years and fell for the same question three times since I ignored it. Question makers wouldn’t add them without a reason so I used the same trick to this one.
I’ll give you another example with a more obvious one than this, using the 3rd part:
The question is who I am talking about while the sentences before the question is there to act as a context clue. The question in this post is the less obvious version of it to trick people, most would literally ignore the context clue, me included.
thank goodness i was sleepy as fck so any form of trick tried to use on me fail automatically!
unless the introduction statement has an order or request about how to answer the question, or the question is literally about the statement, it’s just background knowledge, it can be helpful for answering the question, but it isn’t the question
e.g. the industrial revolution was a period in britain where production shifted from from creating goods by hand to using machines, resulting in a higher standard of living and multiple advancements in technology. what were the causes of the industrial revolution?
the introductory statement here just serves to give the reader background knowledge on what the question is about, the answer wouldn’t change if it was removed
since this topic’s statement doesn’t have any orders and the question itself doesn’t reference the statement, it’s technically completely unrelated to the answer i think
there’s 4: morden, neviro, rackham, and zaix
This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.