what the yap is this, unrelated to forumers it seems
I also do not get the joke thoughā¦
Okay, yes, true. However, keeping up that speed can be difficult given how much more quickly you wear out in armor. And thatās not even mentioning how tiring combat is to begin with.
Okay.
I am Loki. My username is the norse deity of trickery, deceit, mischief, the works. Me vouching for honor is HILARIOUSLY ironic.
Allow me to reiterate,
If the armor wasnāt effective during long battles, why would they wear the armor?
I seeā¦
Anyways, Iām tired. Iāll be on again tomorrow. Multiple times.
I swear Iām not addicted to this forum. Donāt look at my badges. I totally donāt have that one for visiting 365 days in a row.
for short battles duh
I never said it wasnāt effective. Armor is BEYOND effective against most medieval weaponry. However, Iām just saying that you couldnāt maintain speed for long periods in it.
you donāt need speed when youāre using a longbow and in your own territory!
iām not a medieval arms expert but i just wanna let readers know this is really inaccurate
I donāt punch
I 100% because I had a nuclear bomb on my body and it detonates when I stop breathing and releases toxins on explosion, I call it poor mans rose
in arcane odyssey?
if I lose then everybody goes down with me
nah, iād win
Mmm, where, exactly? Iāll concede my point on speed, but saying endurance is more valuable than strength is definitely true. Thereās a reason the Romans had their armies march for miles every single day. Strength isnāt of as much use in combat because weapons are force multipliers, and you deal a lot more damage with structured attacks, not with raw muscle.
Hereās a video and a short that go over this topic.
And no, that bit about honor is also true.
1 Like
Ok what if I brought out a Knockgun (the seven musket barrels strapped to one stock)
I am a 5ā1 female that weighs like 35 kg pls donāt ever think about pitting me against others :((
