You can only choose one, which do you think is better? (Not strictly pvp)
0 voters
Personally, I like the lance more because shining cycle spam and the downwards grab. I like greataxes, but I hate that Halberd loses devastate for seismic slash (it’s a bad move).
Ima choose halberd because I am used to greataxes more than rapiers
Halberd is cooler but Lance is better.
There’s 0 point in hoping for Seismic to ever be good
lance is the cooler option imo
also it’s much better utility wise since shining cycle is pretty busted
halberd because i don’t like swords but do like polearms
Shining cycle is almost as satisfying as carrying the halberd but not quite
The infamous halberd is simply a weaponwith 1 very dope move, seismic slash being bad and skull crusher being very situational, I still like Striking Gale more than Shining Cycle tho.
halberd has only 1 viable move that is quite slow and is really only useful in ganks/wars
lance has 2 and one of them is free damage with almost 0 risk
the other one is the furthest weapon grab in the game with good combo potential
lance is also cleaner so thats a W 
winner is pretty clear
Lance cause seismic slash is currently useless even if you hit the opponent with the boulder it will still do nothing
honestly halberd
i get the lance is cool but i cannot get behind the fact that it’s such a bulky reskin on a slim weapon like the rapier
also halberds are cool poleaxes in general are really underrated weapons
smash with big axe
shit i thought you were talking about the weapons in general can i change my vote
I cannot think of one thing you can’t do with a halberd, I mean:
Kinda left it at as either abilities or appearance because not everyone has a warlord slot
This topic was automatically closed 182 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.