The science behind magic creation in Arcane? (And some holes in it)

which is the chemical result of fire

It isn’t smoke tho???

Are you actually mentally slow or do you think smoke is a hot glowing body?

:popcorn::hungry:

Here we go again

The fact that smoke is a part of “fire” or “flame” is still up to debate, since smoke hardly counts as matter, but a collection of multiple of matter, so particles of liquid, solids, and gas is mixed in with all of it. I personally think smoke is part of flame because it is one of the thing that was generated from fire.

wut

I am getting an actual brain tumor from reading this

IT HAS A FUCKING ENGLISH DEFINITION ALREADY, WHERE IT’S NOT SMOKE, THIS ISN’T POLITICS

The sheer lack of brain cells…

I can’t even argue with someone this dumb, other people at least had functional brains to argue with, goodbye

it
ducking
magic
bruh

I think this is one of the few times I genuinely agree with Level…

iirc arent they made up of like, very small… partical ?

Yes, smoke is a collection of matter, not jsur ONE matter, when we’re talking about “smoke” we’re talking about multiple matters itself


wah ?

stfu, I’m not arguing with this

Yeah, but still follows rules of physics, just very little of them

The more I think about it the more I have no idea what fire is

I’ve thought this for a while, like WM_Drayal said, magic is just magic energy imitating different energies, matters, and elements, not being the actual property in question. For magic creation, are we talking through spells or the overall process?

Yes, imagine fucking saying a collection is just one thing, smoke hardly counts as matter, we term “smoke” indicates a fucking collection, not ONE matter. It‘s like arguing a shelf is a fucking book


sht you now make me wonder it too-

The overall process, and spells

A collection of matter is still matter. I don’t even know what you’re saying at this point but imma go