Mud is a Lost Magic that’s at the bare minimum of uniqueness because of its mechanics?? I just lost the point to this debate
1 Like
Fr he not even making sense bruh, i’m not even tryna sound mean but, what?
This was the point of discussion.
This was your response. You even used my words, you must’ve understood where the point of contention was, didn’t you?
And you also said if the other thing was correct, being enhanced magic, then you would be right. And I said you consider both, not just one.
You also said you created the new discussion of whether Mud is an enhanced magic or a unique magic. I quoted you even. However, the discussion was specifically whether it was an enhanced version of a base, which is what we were talking about as I quoted and you even used part of my own words, or a unique magic. I said consider both.
In fact, Mud is one of the few magics you can assume has good stats. It’s a DENSE mixture of two strong magics. Dense means hard hitting, both magics are hard hitting already. So there is confirmation it’s enhanced. And it’s an enhanced form of both water and earth I can argue it both ways if I wanted to.
You made the claim, burden of proof is on you. For someone so interested in debates you could at least understand how burden of proof works.
Bruh, i think i’ll create whole new post talking about why lost magics are lost and why ancient magics are anceints magics.
me trying to digest the thread i created
1 Like
“what have I done”
1 Like
The only solid point here
This doesn’t relate to common sense though, just because earth and water are both good magics, doesn’t mean mud would be hard-hitting as well, LOGICALLY. If i threw mud at someone, it would do jackshit, just because its derived from two strong magics doesn’t mean it comes out as a positive effect. And if this statement were true, wtf is a mutation doing as a lost magic, get that shit in the starter magic section.
this argument is going in circles
Sir. Sir! You started this company!
you just lost Social Credit for: Posting An Opinion
1 Like
1 Like
You’re Banned
1 Like
Nice counterargument to everything else I said. I can now disregard everything you said that I responded to because you are telling me by not even forming a counterargument that you don’t want to engage. Fine by me. Imagine debating someone and they say “well you only said one good thing” with no elaboration. Thanks a lot.
- It said densely packed too. Dense things hit hard.
Same with Water yet it deals the same as Wood. We have no way of guaranteeing anything will be strong dude. No way. I have no idea if Sun is strong, I just know it has a long lasting DoT. I assume it’s strong because it’s a Lost Fire variation. Losts are strong, so following, Fire losts should be stronger. Do I not apply the same thing to Mud? We have no stats, only assumptions.
I apologize for my previous infractions.
I disregard irrelevancies and useless points to the argument that don’t makes sense and don’t change anything.
np, anytime.
water is like, the only magic in WoM rn that can apply to this point, but who knows, maybe the water is going at a fast speed, water can be as hard as steel if fast 
then why are arguing, we are using our assumptions as evidence, tbh we should drop this rn and shake hands on this very friendly debate. I’m tired and i got skool tmrw.
Then clarify those irrelevancies. Everything you claim you have to prove, burden of proof. Everything I responded to is in my opinion not worth my time at all, yet I still responded because it’s my duty to respond to your vlaims not ditch them all.
Shadow. Sand. Wind. Ink. Snow. All deal average or above. Snow deals the same as ICE. Paper is not high damage but it was strong. Lightning is the inverse, weaker ingame.
K I gotta wake up early tomorrow too gn
alr daddy, good debate, this was enjoyable 
1 Like
