Am i allowed to say the nazis had good drip

This is purely to settle the worlds least important debate in the miraheze discord server

  • Yes
  • No because they didnt have good drip
  • No because of the atrocities™
0 voters

vro :sob:

regardless of how they look, i think the symbolism they carry makes the drip bad

also it was just a military outfit, not really that special, and whatever hitler’s stache and hairdo were certainly weren’t selling it either

Their uniforms were so bland though

Ive always taken it as more of a “seperate the art from the artist” thing yeah the atrocities are obviously horrible but that doesnt change if they look cool or not

what drip did they actually have though

The union (American civil war) had better outfits.

1 Like

A black/white picture isn’t telling anyone anything

i think the symbolism of art, including clothing i suppose in this case, is important to determining its beauty or how good it is. in this sense, what these uniforms symbolise completely spoils their drip factor

1 Like

Tf am i supposed to do go back in time to 1940 wih a color camera and do hitlers photoshoot?

Yes, is there a problem?

or like, a museum

I think they had nice looking shoes

would’ve been better cut at the ankle imo, they look like rainboots at the top

Here have a photo of the all black gestapo trenchcoat in full color :sparkles:

John murder drones outfit

@Sykadelik opinion on N being adolf hitler?

Oh a black/white changed nothing, they really did just look that bland.

Yes, as long as you add that you aren’t glorifying them in any way, shape, or form and reiterate that you do not support them whatsoever.
It’s just a matter of making it clear that you aren’t a neo-nazi since most people can’t separate how someone looks like from how someone is.