Is this ban valid (hint: no)

Game Discussion
101

Alright good to know ig, ty for your response

102

That’s the least logical point since you can just blur out the name

103

I skip the ketch because it lacks a ram slot.

104

Alright, thanks for your input

105

I still don’t like that idea, it makes it so if there was a mistake of some sort, it would never be discovered

106

fair enough but from everyone else’s point of view they got banned for no reason

107

Ngl, we can pretty much confirm this ourselves. So far 1/10 attempts from my alt and still hasn’t triggered anticheat. Doing the same thing in the video too, immediately collecting from left to right.

108

wasn’t there a story once of a mod accidently banning the wrong dude who had to appeal multiple times to get unbanned

109

we can’t blur out the name of the person in the video easily, and even if we do it’s possible that the exploiter could recognize the person, and harass them anyway :wilted_flower:

110

What they gonna recognize them with? Their drip???

1 Like
111

It is possible

112

Takers of videos don’t see their own username EXCEPT in the player list wich is easy to blur

113

Dont waste your time checking it. This never triggers anti cheat and I can say so after collecting all those chests in like 2 sec at least 200 times in at least 20 different servers

Oh and I know of multiple people who have done the exact same and have never gotten banned

114

unless you’re a lb player drip isn’t really an identity proof

115

What if he chatted? What if the exploiter remembered the names or had a video ?

116

I personnaly don’t really have an opinion on if he exploited or not, I just hate the idea that if this is just a mistake, it would never be able to be known or proven.

117

Yeah but like it could be a roblox issue such as the dark sea anticheat incident. Just trying to make sure that isn’t the case considering I’m in danger of getting banned when I collect a lot of chests :sob:

118

that was more on the mistake of the mod, you’d have to at least look at the evidence again during the appeal which would definitely solve that issue, and nowadays thats even less likely to happen because the mod that deals with your case can’t be the same mod that initially banned you

119

Aren’t you that one 5th gen with 3k hours in AO :skull:

120

If we could properly censor the reporter then it would be way better to tell if he exploited