I’m really not the person qualified to be discussing this topic however, if evolution is fake how does one adapt to a new environment, hunt more efficiently, etc? Do you think we just not change at all or…?
There is adapting but humans make humans, cats make cats, dogs make dogs, tigers make tigers, humans by the way have been on earth for at least 6000 years and I can’t help but notice that we have yet to change what creature we are. There is more reason for knowing evolution is fake then what I have typed.
I think that Adam and Eve became mortal in like 4000 B.C. or sometime around there. I could be wrong on the when here but I remember being told 4000 B.C. so 4000 B.C. it is.
Everything stays the same creature.
no
inside
evolution is real I watched spider anime and I saw spider evolve so yeah owned
fiction
evolution is a government lie wdym
you are wrong because you thought I was serious
unless you weren’t serious which makes me wrong.
FUCK!
I guess I took to a serious reply for I wasn’t a 100% sure if you were serious though I was almost certain you were joking.
so basically I win ok
are you deadass or do I have to actually use stuff I learned from school on a lego game forum
alright he’s deadass, hold on
So your idea of evolution is extremely flawed. Evolution and adaptation, from a scientific/historic standpoint, is not the same as pokemon. Evolution is something that takes place over the course of changing environments, where the surviving offspring of a species survive with certain traits, and then genetically pass those traits down. Evolution is not growing wings or gaining superpowers spontaneously.
Evolution can be proven through the idea of natural selection, where only the strong survive long enough to reproduce and pass down the genetically superior traits necessary to survive in the current environment. For example, humans have evolved over time to render our appendix useless, it’s merely a vestigial organ at this point. Humans have also evolved in their bone structures to better accommodate things like the rib cage and the skull, which hold many important internal organs. Neurotic pathways have improved because the cavemen who had the fastest, most efficient neuron paths survived to pass their traits down. This can be seen in many other species too, such as how a certain species of swallows have evolved to develop shorter wings, in order to increase agility and speed when navigating a highway. They evolved to have these traits because the swallows with shorter wingspan mutations were the ones that survived long enough to have offspring.
When you say “we have yet to change what creature we are,” that’s not evolution. That’s like transmutation.
TLDR: Evolution is verifiably provable, and what you’re describing is not evolution.
also how the fuck are you almost 18 and not knowledgeable on evolution?? don’t they teach you this shit in freshman bio?
5 Likes
laaaame i almost pissed my pants when cap lifted mjolnir
Human beings make humans, sure.
But when you take into the consideration the time scale considered when talking about evolution, it’s not so much human beings giving birth to cats as it it human beings giving birth to other humans that are slightly different than they are.
More specifically, a group of animals are said to no longer be in the same species if they can no longer breed with each other i.e. their genetic information is different enough that interbreeding would no longer work.
Not sure if that’s the only criterion, but I know this one is true.
Over time, these differences accumulate until in about a hundred thousand years the child species is different enough from its parents species that they should be called a new one. Don’t think I need to explain the concept of gradual change.
Of course, believing this is predicated on believing that that much time has passed from the advent of man, which you might not believe. That 6000 years number comes from biblical estimations, correct? Not going to ask you of proof of that because that might be against forum rules (or lead to a discussion that is against forum rules), but I doubt you have any.
Bit of a challenge for you, by the way. Evolution is fake and all animals breed “their own”, correct? Explain the phenomenon of ring species then, without falling back to evolution. It seems to contradict this rigid rule.
3 Likes
You’re correct. Biologically, two different animals are incapable of breeding because their predetermined genotypes would not be able to communicate correctly to make a discernible phenotype. Thats why the weird ass fuckers who think screwing animals are okay haven’t given birth to like human-dogs.
2 Likes
is this argument still going on 
do you know how much fun it is watching someone try to deny concrete science
you lied about your age didn’t you… no 18 year old talks like this
lol what are ring species? also that makes no sense why wouldn’t evolution take place with every offspring? huh? huh?
dude just search it up, the internet is right there
also you sound like you’re trolling now
lol I’m 17 and I just so happened to to type as I thought. I go off into tangents in my thoughts, so I went off in tangents there. I typed as I was thinking it.