Just wanted to know y’alls thoughts on this. Personally, I feel like this is just another step towards people owning nothing and being expected to like it, since with digital games, you actually don’t own anything. Pretty similar to why I hate “physical” games that are really just a download code in an oversized box, though at least here, there’s no unnecessary waste being produced.
This is also effectively nuclear armageddon for game preservation, which is what I hate the most.
I hate Limited Run Games with every fiber of my being, but at least, at the very fucking least, the company does produce physical copies of otherwise digital-only games to help preserve them.
Yeah, pretty much. Think the Disc version of the PS5 might still be produced for the stragglers that remain in production, but the PS6 might be nothing more than a PC with far less features for what would’ve been a similar or only slightly-lower price than a PC would go for, if we weren’t constantly going into a new part shortage every year because of good-for-nothing tech bros.
My thoughts are that this will probably reduce the amount of plastic used for physical discs, and that we could have more components inside of the game consoles due to the lack of a disc reader.
However this is going to be bad for anyone who wants to own the disc for a game… since people for some reason think that they’re safe if some corporate person decides to take the game off of the console.
I will say that the stuff to do with:
Since yes bluefighter, it’s not theft, but it’s still illegal and it’s considered piracy. It’s kinda stupid since I doubt that having the physical discs for a game protects you from the game being taken down.
But ig people would rather parrot these sentences than actually push policy makers to make policies to protect consumers…
Also I feel like some gamers don’t understand real life in a sense, since even if you buy a chair, that doesn’t mean that you keep that chair forever, it can break, but for some reason some gamers don’t understand that…
When people say that, usually they refer to the fact that, at literally any moment, Sony can shut down your playstation’s store and prevent everyone from downloading or playing games they own. Unless you have those games already downloaded and never uninstall them (i.e. imagine the Wii U eshop right now)
I literally haven’t bought physical games since like, switch year 1, probably 8 years.
Yet this is still really bad. Sony did it, so Nintendo and Xbox will be right after. There’s many downsides:
Completely kills used game sales and trade. Whether through stores or between gamers.
Forced to rely on the manufacturer’s store for sales, no opportunity of reseller and physical stores giving sales. Woo paying 80$ for ass old games 2 years later, can’t buy bargain old games in stores. Literally Nintendo has been doing that from exclusivity for so long.
You’re dependant on your console’s online store surviving. The moment your console becomes old and irrelevant enough to have its store closed, lose all games you didn’t have downloaded at the time. For example, the Wii U; all the eshop games you have can’t be redownloaded anymore.
Exclusives that aren’t rereleased later, will now forever die and disappear if not for illegal copies and emulation. Game preservation is dying even more.
Regardless, I will buy games virtually. I literally live in the middle of nowhere, I have no stores. But this is still a big issue for many people and the industry as a whole.
After reading this it made me think, why don’t companies make two different versions of the consoles, one that can accept discs, and another that can’t accept discs, that way you can choose to buy the one that suits you best.
Sony already did that with the PS5 having Digital-Only and Disc-Supportive versions, and Microsoft did the same with the Series S/X (X having a disc drive, S lacking it). There’s clearly still a market for physical games.
Small problem though, the disc-supporting versions of both consoles are more expensive, even though the Digital-Only variants are already expensive as hell.
Sorry, that was me trying to point out how Sony (and probably Microsoft) would likely not produce versions of their consoles that support discs if there wasn’t a market for physical games.
Yeah, fair; I feel like the extra cost for a disc drive would be okay, if the consoles weren’t already super expensive without it.
Even the refurbished Digital edition is $500, which I don’t think is matched by any past console other than the initial price of the PS3 (which was planned to be $600 with one of the launch versions; don’t get me started on that, that’s a whole other tangent).
Forgor to mention that you are NOT seeing the refurbished consoles in stores. I don’t think those get put on store shelves at all, for any console producer.