Yet as soon as you mentioned my tone being a facade, which I assure you it wasn’t, I’ve fell back on my insults, no? You’re a bit late to the self-reflection, because it’s the second time you’ve mentioned it and you can’t see any signs. 
But you think what you want to think, TheoreticalExistence.
Been in the same clan since before I joined forums. 
This is one topic, you followed stock around for weeks.
typa shit i feel getting mr hyperspace in this
I never followed them, I literally just corrected them when they were wrong
If they are wrong in a lot of different topics, that’s on them
But I’m not here to interrupt the wedding ceremony. Carry on
act. facade.
My apologies if I used the term “act”, I meant attitude.
the first time you brought up the word “act” in referring to your attitude, you said “its all part of the act”, emphasizing that your behavior was an act intended to provoke people.
you are not the skilled liar you think you are.
or am I to assume that you’re just inconsistent with your word choice and confusing to talk to as a result. I have more faith in your ability to speak than that.
Wasn’t this to a comment saying I sound like a 16th Century Aristocrat due to my lexicon, and not due to my tone? 
This sounds like some high tier nitpicking, but I’m all for it.
Not to play the “i want pity card”, which is not my intention, but English isn’t my first language, yes my words are going to be inconsistent, and you’ve probably seen that across countless instances of this thread.
That response was in reference to both your word choice and your attitude.
Scratch that, it was just about you being smug. (your attitude)
I inferred it to be due to my lexicon, which was what I understood to be somewhat resemblant of a 16th Century Aristocrat upon reading the response.
Are you trying to take a pick at me because you think I don’t know what smug is?
No, I was emphasizing the point.
I’m not going to stoop that low.
You sure do look like you are stooping that low, and I’m rather dissapointed that you felt the need to do such.
You have done little but disappoint me through this entire discussion.
You have made more than a few baseless assumptions about me.
Don’t worry it’s mutual. 
Care to name them so we can bring them back into motion during this discussion?
If you insist.
The wolf howls 
while the hawk tuahs 
You claimed that I was unwilling to read your points because I asked where your reasonable ones are (stating that you had made no reasonable points).
You claimed that I was so obsessed with arguing that I didn’t even have a point to make and just wanted to start a fuss.
Now, you have claimed that I’m making fun of a language barrier that doesn’t exist.
if ur existence is theoretical why dont you theoretically disappear 
geez bro can we get a mod to close this
this is ad hominem on both sides at its peak
they both AA clashed “Ultimate Art: Derail Thread!”
Neptune rules the seas 