Consider it more so as criticism based off of publicly available information and less so as just short sighted complaints.
Granted a fair amount of it is usually just people making short sighted complaints about things they don’t know anything about. But when you give your community access to bits and pieces of information without the full context, they’re going to discuss that information among themselves and not the entirety of it. Simply because they don’t know how much there is underneath the surface or if there even is anything under there.
I get what ya mean mate, but it appears as if your labeling alot of well thought out criticism as simple complaints.
Most of us here understand that what we know is limited and that it should be treated as such.
( I hope so at least. )
We’re simply debating over the currently accessible information pool among ourselves and speculating what the final product will actually end up as.
Sincerely,
CoffeeAndNums, A.K.A Supreme Numsness.