The cemetery

Off Topic
285

no i actually weigh more then a blue whale because i ate the bagger 288 as a child

286

i wonder how long that must have taken you

287

2 seconds
ok i must now go

288

we had a reddit admin as a forum user?

289

WTF? Source now.

290

Shocked this wasn’t posted before.

291

An arguement about loli art. The mods talked about it and nyed nyed them. I might give link.

292

Good

293

image
Who this is the alt of I have no idea

294

NOOOO, HE WAS TOO YOUNG TO DIE!

keystroke

295

crazy lmao, talking about pedo art in forums
i’m not for removing people for opinions but it is what it is

296

some opinions are just objectively wrong

297

that was fast

298

an opinion can’t be objective, that’s contradictory
in any case, it’s still an opinion no matter how grotesque

it doesn’t directly encourage harm, so it’s a pass in my book
the most i’d do is avoid certain topics with him

1 Like
299

I agree with the bottom part, although realistically I’m not really gonna protest with his ban since it’s pretty justifiable to be worried about a person who says that. Honestly I just feel uncertain about it, but it’s like a month since and lets be honest the guy probably has 20 alternative accounts.

300

believing pornography or media with sexual intention about children does endager children and in a way encourages harm as its in no way working against it

301

didnt say that :fr:

302

my opinion on their opinion is that their opinion is fucking bullshit

303

Rip these accounts

Some of em

304

do you mean “consuming” or “supporting”?
probably don’t mean “believing”.

i meant it can’t have an objective status as “wrong” or “right”.
if you call something objectively wrong, you are saying it’s objective.

agree, was actually going to say that with my initial post but didn’t find need to
doesn’t mean his opinion directly encourage harm though

i specify “directly” because anyone can say an opinion indirectly supports harm, it’s a very “political” tactic though, only use is to attribute potentially false intentions on the other party

to not work against something is to encourage it?
i’d say not working against something is just not working against it.
not pushing this particular thought any more forward though, seeing as it’ll be non-forum-friendly