apparently the man made trains come on time ig in italy
Thatâs hot
In accordance to my previous reply. My friend told me that hitler was rejected from art school.
You really canât pull down someoneâs pants unless youâre touching the pants to begin with when stopping time. With time stopping, that would also mean the transfer of light would stop making everything see-able
Or maybe the world ends up in a âSound of Thunderâ scenario.
But light would be frozen in time, although I guess you could say if you walked forward or backward everything would look weird as fuck because the light isnât moving to you
Hitler wasnât the only one who thought that, WW2 mightâve still happened but without the Holocaust and shit is what Iâm thinking because the Holocaust were a minorityâs views like the KKK before Hitler took over Germany.
Wdym probably not be likely? Do you not know about the famine Germany faced at the time, which also was one of the reasons of the Holocaust(The economy went to shit as they were printing too many bills though the main reason was still hitlerâs shitty political views). Iâm trying to say that it is likely, not just mentioning a possibility.
Ya, itâs technically not stopping time because if you actually stopped time, youâd be frozen/canât hear/canât see/canât breath/your heart is literally stopped/so are all the rest of your organs. But none of this matters because that part in time is frozen so to time it seemed like you could always breath, see, etc.
Whenever someone says âstopping timeâ Iâd rather think about it as rewriting reality for a certain thing to occur, whether that be movement a knife throw, a punch, or anything else within a timeframe they have to do those actions.
Yeah, even without Hitler, WWII would have happenedâ Notably with Japan, which went to war with China a couple years before Hitler went to war with Poland (and friends), although Japanâs war with China may have been labelled differently than WWII.
I am not a historian so I can not say for certain.
Also, how did a topic about time travel become so history based (especially WWI-WWII). Even if it is time travelâŚ
Canât happen, it you kill your past self, who will come back to kill you?
So if the universe doesnât arrange for your failure, some sort of time travel police definetely will (their existence is mandated by the fact that you were stopped by something thatâs not pure chance, so itâs gotta be someone or something with an objective to do so).
And how do we know they have succeeded?
First thing, you were able to go back in the first place, meaning you werenât killed earlier, and they get infinite attempts to stop, cuz time travel. They will eventually succeed, and until then youâll be swarmed by interspace agents.
If you go in the future and succeed in killing yourself, nothing will stop that from happening when the time comes.
If in that time noone came to stop you, or noone succeded, even if some in-between you came he would have to fail because the number 1 you succeeded.
Best case scenario is you come late and kill him when itâs all already over for him anywaysâŚ
Iâm assuming that time somehow stops flowing, but you still somehow function normally.
some physics stuff trying to explain it
Newtonian physics say the same amount of heat is emitted by friction as normally is.
By the second law of thermodynamics, you can only convert energy, and the kinetic energy friction takes away must be converted to some other energy.
Canât be chemical, electric, nuclear or any other for obvious reasons, so itâs gonna all be heat.
The amount of thermal energy is then equal to the kinetic energy take away from the pants, which is just the work of friction.
Work of a force is W=F ⢠d, where d is distance crossed. As you can see, time taken is irrelevant, so no, noone is set on fire.
If by some other imaginary physics model, you somehow get an equation that looks like ÎT = whatever/Ît, where T is temperature and t is time, you are right in one thing, the temperatur exchange is directly proportional to 1/Ît.
To calculate the temperature change, youâd set a limÎt â 0 and calculate under that.
But hereâs the catch, time isnât approaching 0 Iâm this example, it is 0.
You would be dividing by 0 in your formula, a big no-no. We donât have mathematical model to explain division by 0, so the answer is we donât know.
But even then, our imaginary physics model requires time to pass for heat to be transmitted, and since no time has passed, no gets can be transmitted.
TL;DR noone gets set on fire, time doesnât play a role in the work of friction.
just skin em alive lol
Are we talking about the MCUâs version of time travel or Back to The Futureâs type of time travel
Mix them both
That would be pretty difficult considering that they are different concepts
Just go with whatever time theory makes the most sense to you
For me the MCUâs version makes more sense, cause it doesnât create a paradox, and it causes pain and suffering for others, for example if you were a great scentist who discovered the cure for cancer, and then traveled âback in timeâ and killed yourself it would create a new universe and have the cure for cancer be postponed for another decade or two
I heard an answer to this question a long time ago, where going back in time would make everything in this âpast timeâ out of some sort of reverse matter, and if your matter came into contact with your own reverse matter, both of you would merge instantly, killing you both
easiest way to solve all of this is parallel universes.
Killed yourself? oh that just starts a new universe where you died, but in your universe you are still living
Killed Baby Hitler? starts a new universe where WWII didnât start until Russia and America got pissed at each other and threw bombs at each other because political tension was too high because they never allied in what shouldâve been WWII.
Stopping time is an entire different thing.
If you stopped it completely, then you would be moving at infinite speeds, and if you touched something, anything at all, either it or yourself would be atomized.