It’s safe to assume they will be named after metals. And to me it safe to guess at least the first two will be named after the bronze and iron ages of tool/weapon development/warfare. Then tangentially connected the silver and gold seas because ofc if you’re naming things after metals you can’t skip those.
if there is more than 4 (which is probable) Steel would be a good pick
I don’t think they will be named after metals. That doesn’t make any sense. The bronze sea was named that way for its production of bronze or something, why would literally every other sea also be named after what metal comes from it
Also I hope the seas don’t all use the exact same naming convention with the middle word swapped out, having seas with one word names would be cool
This used to be my original reao=soning on the seas’ naming and also the amount of seas:
But I no longer think that way, since that was before I knew the Bronze Sea was called so because it was known for the prevalence of its namesake mineral. While I can see the other seas being named after resources or minerals that are commonly found there, it doesn’t necessarily have to be metals. It would be unrealistically convenient if each progressing sea happened to have an abundance of metal that was more valuable than the sea before it, or if metal was the only common mineral worth naming every sea after.
I think it’s possible for the other seas to either be named after the cardinal directions like the bronze sea was supposed to be, or something that stands out in particular about that sea
since the bronze sea was originally named the southern sea (i think) i assumed there would be 4, each named after an important part of their economy or culture