how has this not been closed yet woah
anyways
this is so true completely agreed
how has this not been closed yet woah
anyways
this is so true completely agreed
vetex is searching for a girlfriend
Why were the first two posts i clicj on today ragebait posts. Kinda goofy ngl
skibidi toilet skibidi skibidi toilet
âThe fact you think weâre 100% serious is hilarious, although I still believe it.â
Dude stop the double-talk and just own up to your positions. Every single response you say is "yeah I donât believe it but I actually kind of believe it but at the same time I donât "
Like imagine anyone did this with anything else âYeah I donât 100% believe in flat earth but donât you think the theory still holds some sort of water?â
Just the above example. âI donât believe in flat earth theory but Iâm going to defend it anyways.â This implies you do believe in it but you donât want the heat associated with taking a stupid position. So instead you stoop to the level of a child and play to the fact that you didnât literally word-for-word say âI 100% no-doubt positively believe in it.â
You talk about not being able to trust Vetâs words and you expect me to trust yours when your energy completely flips after someone calls out your dumb opinions out. Yeah I donât buy it.
Are you really going to hinge the entirety of this argument on âyeah you arenât literally in his head so you canât make that claimâ when youâre trying to make claims based on nothing? Oh I forgot sorry, youâre not actually making a claim youâre just defending a stupid claim. Mb.
Like I donât understand if someone is like streaming themselves playing a videogame do you just join the VC and start asking âwell achtually, what if someone else is playing for you and youâre just talking over the clip .â
The level of denial you need to engage in to make your arguments work is astounding.
This doesnât even warrant a response because everyone here knows this is stupid including you.
All Iâm gonna say is you have this stupid tactic of making a claim and whenever itâs challenged you start to take everything to the extreme.
âNo I donât 100% believe it.â
âIs making a guess a crime?â
âAre you morphed together with Vetex?â
Talk normally. Donât bring up extremes.
So you finally decided to use logic. Would be a little bit better if you werenât making even more unfavourable assumptions on the side but I canât complain that you applied your brain for once.
Heâs got me
so this is all of a sudden black and white? when something plays a part, it isnt the entire reason ffs . to add on, something can not be 100% serious and still hold water. saying someone has no bitches is an unserious insult, but he DOES get no bitches.
what you said right there could be applicable to a theory that DOES hold water, because as you said, âimagine if someone did this with anything elseâ. youâre so simpleminded its astonishing. theres levels of complexity you arent reading so itâs funny that youâre trying to establish yourself as the intellectual.
i had to reread what you said when i told you to elaborate, i was reading paragraphs separately. for one i never treated it as a plausible theory (therefore a hypothesis). how did you come to the conclusion that me making assumptions is code for âi 100% believe thisâ? do you want me to delve into his life for a discussion like this? im sure you wont either so dont bullshit about observations lmao. back to what youâve said here, im not sure if theres been miscommunication but i dont gaf about heat from a roblox game forum. the way you talk it seems like you lack social understanding and you use pure logic, disregarding social complexities to back your claims. youâve brought a programming book into real life. ill shorten things up for the last part, using the things ive previously said to say, no. i did not word for word say what youâre describing i said.
do you think my words being untrustworthy in your eyes somehow bring validity to what vetex says? i dont have anything on his life i can prove, and neither does he because he wont reveal his life to that extent. does that put us on the same level of trust, speaking âlogicallyâ. oh yeah, you dont have to trust what i say because im not spitting facts and you arent either.
ill put this back on you since you dodged the reason i said that. why does he have validity to that extent?
dont act like theres plenty denial in you too. for starters you wont even question vetex if he says something and you go âheh⌠i know all about his life and THIS is really what happened!â. dont go around flailing claims like this if you dont wanna be met with claims equally refutable.
im sorry, are you talking about⌠metaphors??? and for âi dont 100% believe itâ in what universe is this an extreme? am i supposed to either be fully against something or fully in itâs favour?
i hope in the future youâll decide to make claims like a human rather than a program, thanks.
Yall on a honeymoon or something
im so glad my apprentice can succeed me in overextending arguments
but seriously this thread should be closed why tf is this still thriving
Since when did I become your apprentice
im talking about pakv smh
They wonât stop ARUGING⌠Clearly, Vetex has this little tester argue for him.
It doesnât even matter whether or not itâs black and white. It could be 70% or 50%, point is you believe it, you committed to it, and youâre trying to diminish your commitment to the point by pretending you donât have that same level of confidence the moment you get pushback.
Really? It could? I donât believe you because that definitely disagrees with what I was saying and completely destroys my argument .
The entire point of using an example that doesnât hold water is to illustrate the fact that you are downplaying a COMMITMENT to a certain idea because the idea in question is unappealing to the audience. Whether or not the idea holds water doesnât matter to the comparison, what matters is why you are downplaying it, and the answer is because you think it holds water but you want to downplay how confident you are because it looks bad.
What even is this point? You just said words to say words?
You argued in favour of it without considering an alternative until I pressed you hard enough. In which case you proceeded to double down by saying âif thatâs the case that heâs Tinder dating then heâs probably unlikeable anyways due to those traits.â
What this demonstrates is commitment to a point. If you are committed to a point it is beyond reasonable to assume that you believe it.
Unless youâre arguing of course that I need to assert my point through pure logicand ignore the social complexities of dishonesty. In which case yes, I guess you never said you 100% beleve it
So then stop defending dumb claims made about him? Itâs literally that easy.
I donât know why you keep trying to assert that I believe he is right because I believe youâre untrustworthy. Iâve already said itâs the complete opposite way around.
You seem to have this cartoonish view of me asking Vetex âhey can you share with the chat what is going on with your life?â And then him answering. But sure, social complexities.
Yeah letâs immediately target the 1/3 examples that fit my argument and ignore the other 2.
Anyways, as said before, it doesnât actually matter whether you 100% believe it or not. But by emphasizing the figure â100%â that allows you to distance yourself from the point. âI donât 100% believe it, I only 50% believe it.â This is exaggerating things and it is a childâs tactic. Donât commit to a point and then downplay your commitment.
weâve solved racism
I can confirm that I am being paid minimum wage to respond to him
its okay⌠i protect vetex too. you see, my green aura, it protects him from all the haters. now you may be asking how this green aura protects him. essentially, it works as a shield because no one dares pass through it because of the smell it emits. since no one passes through it, king vetex is safe.
Love story of the century